Author Archive

Insights & Commentary: China’s 12th Five-Year Plan

Abstract On the eve of the National People’s Congress, Greenpeace calls for China to strengthen and improve the 12th Five-Year Plan’s language and data on energy, environment taxation, industrial and agricultural pollution, and other environmental issues. The government must fully demonstrate its commitment to a “green transformation” and seize the opportunity of the next five years to reverse the trend of environmental destruction and degradation. Only then will China be on the path of green, sustainable development, vital to not only its own future but also the global environment.
Author Greenpeace 2011
Publisher
Link http://www.greenpeace.org/eastasia/Global/eastasia/publications/reports/others/2011/greenpeace-commentary-twelfth-five-year-plan.pdf
Attachment
1 Energy and Climate, 1.1 General Energy Concerns, 1.1.3 International and Foreign Think-tanks, Research Institutes, NGOs and Individual Researchers

Evaluation of China’s Energy Strategy Options

Abstract Developed by energy experts from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, this report analyzes how energy investment can be redirected, energy supply developed, and energy efficiency increased to meet China’s high-level national development goals—increasing energy security, maintaining economic growth, and improving standards of living and the health of its citizens. The report prioritizes energy policies according to their effectiveness in helping China reach its national development goals and describes in detail what China’s government must do to enact such policies.
Author China Sustainable Energy Program, May 2005
Publisher
Link http://www.efchina.org/csepupfiles/report/2006102695218686.4335721472912.pdf/NEP_LBNL_EN.pdf
Attachment
1 Energy and Climate, 1.1 General Energy Concerns, 1.1.3 International and Foreign Think-tanks, Research Institutes, NGOs and Individual Researchers

China Energy – A Guide For the Perplexed

Abstract The purpose of this policy analysis is to make visible the internal dynamics of the Chinese energy situation, which most observers glimpse only second hand as the impact of demand on world markets, the behavior of Chinese firms abroad and the effect of Chinese emissions on the global environment. Our hope in doing so is to facilitate energy policy cooperation between China and other countries, more rational conception of and reaction to China’s energy behavior by markets and governments, and more effective prioritization of the energy reform agenda in China, the United States, and elsewhere.
Author Trevor Houser; Daniel H. Rosen; May 2007
Publisher
Link http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/rosen0507.pdf
Attachment
1 Energy and Climate, 1.1 General Energy Concerns, 1.1.3 International and Foreign Think-tanks, Research Institutes, NGOs and Individual Researchers

Growing Chinese Energy Demand

Abstract Only a few years ago Chinese government leaders were optimistic that their country could quadruple its GDP between 2000 and 2020 while only doubling energy consumption. For any other developing country this would be considered an unrealistic goal, as energy consumption during development tends to grow as fast as or even faster than GDP. Yet, China had quadrupled GDP while only doubling energy use from 1980 through 2000, so government officials reasoned they could do it again. However, China is already off track in meeting its 2000-2020 energy consumption goals, and the country is now at a point where it will be nearly impossible to prevent energy consumption from more than doubling. Energy use, instead of growing half as fast as GDP, has grown notably faster than GDP on average since 2000. Notwithstanding, China s government, as well as major energy statistics agencies including the International Energy Agency (IEA) and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), have been so captivated by the original, optimistic story line that their forecasts have not caught up to the reality of what is happening in China. In this report, the authors examine the period from 1980 through 2000 and explain why it was unusual for the Chinese energy industry. Then, they look at the changes in China since 2000, including in the critical electric power generating sector. Using a simple thought experiment, they illustrate that even with very conservative assumptions about Chinese GDP growth and income elasticity of electricity demand out to 2025, the country will experience much higher coal demand and emit much greater volumes of carbon emissions than forecast by IEA and DOE. This leads to some final thoughts on the implications of future Chinese energy demand on global energy markets.
Author Center for Strategic and International Studies, James P. Dorian and Malcolm Shealy, 2007
Publisher
Link http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/071211-shealy-growingchineseenergy-web.pdf
Attachment
1 Energy and Climate, 1.1 General Energy Concerns, 1.1.3 International and Foreign Think-tanks, Research Institutes, NGOs and Individual Researchers

Understanding Energy in China: Geographies of Energy Efficiency

Abstract Geographies of Energy Efficiencies is APERC’s second phase energy project on ‘Understanding Energy in China’. The first part of this report identified energy efficiency and conservation as a priority of China’s national energy policy. Our objective here has been to explore how China is pursuing energy efficiency and conservation and to what result. This report provides information on the implementation of China’s energy efficiency and conservation policies that we expect will be of interest to both Chinese and international audiences. This work is published by the Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre as an independent study and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the APEC Energy Working Group, individual member economies, or other contributors. We hope that it will serve as a useful basis for discussion and analysis both within and among APEC member economies for the enhancement of energy security, the promotion of regional cooperation, and in furthering sustainable development.
Author APERC Report (Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre), Mardrianto Kadri – APERC Senior Researcher, APERC Workshop, Bali, Indonesia, 16 November 2009
Publisher
Link The full report can be found here http://aperc.ieej.or.jp/file/2010/9/26/APERC_China_2009_rev.pdf

The summary can be found here http://aperc.ieej.or.jp/file/2010/9/26/4_China_06_EWG38.pdf

Attachment
1 Energy and Climate, 1.1 General Energy Concerns, 1.1.3 International and Foreign Think-tanks, Research Institutes, NGOs and Individual Researchers

China’s New National Energy Commission: Policy Implications

Abstract On 27 January 2010, China announced the establishment of a new institution  under the State Council—the National Energy Commission. The institution is like a cabinet within the Cabinet. The National Energy Commission is housed in the State Council, suggesting the rise of power of the government. Out of 27 ministers, 12 are on board in the newly established National Energy  Commission. Most notably, ministers of Foreign Affairs, State Security,  Finance, Environmental Protection, Commerce, Land and Resources, and  Water Resources are among the 21 members. Moreover, the military is also represented. The establishment of such a super-ministry at this time reflects Chinese leaders’ concern for energy efficiency, energy security, and environmental protection. By establishing this super-ministry, China’s leadership attempts to better coordinate energy policy in order to get intra-agency cooperation on strategic initiatives on carbon emission reduction and energy efficiency improvement. The National Energy Commission is tasked to produce China’s energy development strategy, review issues of energy security and development, and coordinate domestic energy exploration and international energy cooperation. The establishment of such an institution on energy policy is certainly a step in the right direction to tackle energy security and environmental issues in China.  But it remains to be seen how this super-ministry actually operates and whether it can produce desired results.
Author EAI Background Brief No. 504; Bo Zhiyue; 5 February 2010
Publisher
Link http://www.eai.nus.edu.sg/BB504.pdf
Attachment
1 Energy and Climate, 1.1 General Energy Concerns, 1.1.3 International and Foreign Think-tanks, Research Institutes, NGOs and Individual Researchers

Testimony Before the Congressional-Executive Commission on China: Measuring, Monitoring, and Reporting Energy and Climate Data

Abstract Thank you for the opportunity to contribute to the deliberations of this Commission. My name is Deborah Seligsohn, and I am Senior Advisor to the China Climate and Energy Program at the World Resources Institute. The World Resources Institute is a non-profit, non-partisan environmental think tank that goes beyond research to provide practical solutions to the world’s most urgent environment and development challenges. We work in partnership with scientists, businesses, governments, and non-governmental organizations in more than seventy countries to provide information, tools and analysis to address problems like climate change, the degradation of ecosystems and their capacity to provide for human well-being. I am delighted to speak with you today about China’s systems for measuring, monitoring, and reporting energy and climate data, how these systems have been implemented and the opportunities for continuing to build capacity and improve these systems
Author World Resources Institute; Deborah Seligsohn; April 1, 2010
Publisher
Link http://www.chinafaqs.org/files/chinainfo/deborah_seligsohn_testimony_4-1-10.pdf
Attachment
1 Energy and Climate, 1.1 General Energy Concerns, 1.1.3 International and Foreign Think-tanks, Research Institutes, NGOs and Individual Researchers

Special Energy and Climate Issue

Abstract China’s success in promoting clean energy technology has been a hot story over the past year as the China Environment Forum team pulled together this special Energy and Climate issue of the China Environment Series. We ambitiously aimed to create; and hope our readers think we succeeded;in creating an issue that takes a snapshot of major energy trends in China and understand some of the complexities in the U.S.-China energy and climate relations. This eleventh issue is our biggest yet, due not just to our inability to say no to so many great paper proposals, but also because of the dynamism in clean energy developments in China and many exciting developments in U.S.-China energy cooperation;in both government, NGO, and business spheres. We hope you enjoy this issue! This special Energy and Climate issue was made possible through a grant from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, as well as support from the Blue Moon Fund, USAID, Vermont Law School, Western Kentucky University, and the ENVIRON Foundation
Author Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, China Environment Series, Issue 11, 2010/2011
Publisher
Link http://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/china-environment-series-1120102011
Attachment
1 Energy and Climate, 1.1 General Energy Concerns, 1.1.3 International and Foreign Think-tanks, Research Institutes, NGOs and Individual Researchers

What China Can Learn From International Experiences in Developing a Demand Response Program

Abstract Internationally, there is a growing trend in employing market-based approaches through demand response (DR) to effectively manage electricity supply and demand particularly during the peak power use. China can significantly benefit by localizing international experiences in DR. Such international experiences, when integrated in the ongoing pilot demand-side management (DSM) programs in China, can provide greater flexibility to electricity customers and help China identify a potential solution in addressing the peak load issues. After the discussion of why China needs a new approach to meet its peak demand, this paper highlights international experience in adopting enabling policies to promote DR and in employing practical DR strategies geared toward the industrial sector. Through these experiences, we provide recommendations for how to integrate DR in China’s DSM programs.
Author Shen, Bo; Ni, Chun Chun; Ghatikar, Girish; Price, Lynn; 2012
Publisher
Link http://drrc.lbl.gov/sites/drrc.lbl.gov/files/LBNL-5578E.pdf
Attachment
1 Energy and Climate, 1.1 General Energy Concerns, 1.1.3 International and Foreign Think-tanks, Research Institutes, NGOs and Individual Researchers

What Goes Up: Recent Trends in China’s Energy Consumption

Abstract Since 1996, China’s energy output has dropped by 17%, while primary energy use has fallen by 4%, driven almost entirely by shrinking output from coal mines and declining direct use. Since China is the world’s second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases, it is important to understand the sources of this apparent transformation, and whether it portends a permanent change in patterns of energy use. This remarkable reversal of the long-term expansion of energy use has occurred even as the economy has continued to grow, albeit more slowly than in the early 1990s. Generation of electric power has risen, implying a steep fall in end uses, particularly in industry. Available information points to a variety of forces contributing to this phenomenon, including rapid improvements in coal quality, structural changes in industry, shutdowns of factories in both the state-owned and non-state segments of the economy, improvements in end-use efficiency, and greater use of gas and electricity in households. A combination of slowing economic growth, industrial restructuring, broader economic system reforms, and environmental and energy-efficiency policies has apparently led to at least a temporary decline in, and perhaps a long-term reduction in the growth of energy use, and therefore greenhouse gas emissions
Author Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report (LBNL-44283); Sinton, Jonathan E.; Fridley, David G., 2000
Publisher
Link http://china.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/lbl-44283-energy-use-trendfeb-2000.pdf
Attachment
1 Energy and Climate, 1.1 General Energy Concerns, 1.1.3 International and Foreign Think-tanks, Research Institutes, NGOs and Individual Researchers